Otherworldly Origins: Adam and Jesus in the Quran

by / Wednesday, 25 June 2014 / Published in Articles, Evolution vs. Creation, Faith and Science

Tafsir Evolution Adam

In the Holy Quran, Allah, the Exalted, says:

The similitude of Jesus before Allah is as that of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to him: “Be.” And he was.” (3:59)

This is one of the most explicit verses in the Quran on the topic of Adam’s (as) miraculous, non-biological origins.

Increasingly, modern Muslim commentators, like Usama Hasan, argue that Muslims ought to, not only accept evolutionary theory, but also realize that evolution — as an account of the origins of life and humankind — is itself endorsed by revelation. To this end, they cite verses such as:

Allah has created every creature from water. And of them are those that move on their bellies, and of them are those that walk on two legs, and of them are those that walk on four. Allah creates what He wills. Indeed, Allah is over all things competent.” (24:45)


And Allah has caused you to grow from the earth a [progressive] growth.” (71:17)

At the same time, other verses, on a plain reading, substantiate a non-evolutionist, non-gradualist view:

O mankind, fear your Lord, who created you from one soul and created from it its mate and dispersed from both of them many men and women. And fear Allah, through whom you ask one another, and the wombs. Indeed Allah is ever over you an Observer.” (4:1)

Some Muslims, in arguing for the evolutionist reading, take this last verse as figurative. Others may take the verse as clear, literal, qat`i (definitive), but resort to an “enouslment” view to reconcile the verses on Adam with evolutionary theory.

In contrast, verse 3:59, cited at the top, gives inarguable, definitive evidence of the Quran’s and, more broadly, Islamic theology’s incompatibility with evolutionary thought.

As I have argued before, the singular, decisive proposition that draws the proverbial line in the sand logically and unequivocally distinguishing traditional Islamic theological conceptions of Adam from modern evolution is whether or not the first human being had biological origins. Traditional Islamic thought says the first human being, Adam, was a special, miraculous creation of God, having no parents. Modern science says that it is impossible — theoretically, empirically, historically, etc., — that the first human being was not born of (non-human) parents.

One of the many significances of verse 3:59 is that it explicitly connects the creation of Jesus (as) to the creation of Adam (as). The well-known Islamic theological position on Jesus is that he was of miraculous origin, born to the Virgin Mary sans father (biological or otherwise). Allah makes this very clear in the Quran, and there is widespread agreement from Muslim scholars on the subject of Jesus’ virgin birth. By mentioning Adam (as) with Jesus (as), this verse likens the miraculousness of Adam’s origin with the miraculousness of Jesus’ origin.

To better understand this connection, it is helpful to reference the classical Muslim exegesis of verse 3:59. How did Muslim scholars of the past understand the question of whether or not Adam had biological ancestors? Below are a list of translated references from premodern tafsirs of verse 3:59. To read more on the question of how traditional Muslim theological conceptions of Adam relate to or can be reconciled with modern evolutionary thought, see here.

ibn Abbas

Allah then explained the creation of Jesus without a father because the delegation of Najran asked the Prophet to provide proof from the Qur’an for his saying that Jesus was not the son of Allah, so Allah said: (Lo! the likeness of Jesus) the likeness of the creation of Jesus (with Allah) without a father (is as the likeness of Adam. He created him of dust) without a father or mother, (then He said unto him) to Jesus: (Be! and he is) a son without a father.


Truly, the likeness of Jesus, his remarkable case, in God’s sight, is as Adam’s likeness, as the case of Adam, whom God created without father or mother: this is a comparison of one remarkable thing with another more remarkable, so that it convinces the disputer and establishes itself in one’s mind more effectively. He created him, Adam, that is, his form, of dust, then said He to him, ‘Be,’, a human being, and he was; similarly, He said to Jesus, ‘Be’ — without a father — and he was.

ibn Kathir

Allah said, (Verily, the likeness of `Isa before Allah) regarding Allah’s ability, since He created him without a father, (is the likeness of Adam), for Allah created Adam without a father or a mother. Rather, (He created him from dust, then (He) said to him: “Be! and he was.) Therefore, He Who created Adam without a father or a mother is able to create `Isa, as well, without a father. If the claim is made that `Isa is Allah’s son because he was created without a father, then the same claim befits Adam even more. However, since such a claim regarding Adam is obviously false, then making the same claim about `Isa is even more false. Furthermore, by mentioning these facts, Allah emphasizes His ability, by creating Adam without a male or female, Hawa’ from a male without a female, and `Isa from a mother without a father, compared to His creating the rest of creation from male and female.


(Lo! the likeness of Jesus with Allah is as the likeness of Adam…) [3:59]. The commentators of the Qur’an said: “The delegation of Najran said to the Messenger of Allah, Allah bless him and give him peace: ‘Why do you insult Jesus?’ He said: ‘What did I say about him?’ They said: ‘You say that he is a servant’. He said: ‘Indeed, he is the servant and messenger of Allah, as well as His word which He cast into the Virgin Mary’. They became angry and said: ‘Have you ever seen a human being who was born without a father? If you are truthful, show us such a person’. And so Allah, exalted is He, revealed this verse”. Abu Bakr Ahmad ibn Muhammad al-Harithi informed us> ‘Abd Allah ibn Muhammad ibn Ja’far> Sahl Abu Yahya al-Razi> Sahl ibn ‘Uthman> Yahya> Waki’> Mubarak> al-Hasan who said: “Two monks from Najran came to see the Prophet, Allah bless him and give him peace, and he invited them to surrender to Allah. One of them said: ‘We have surrendered to Allah before you’. He said: ‘You lie! Three things prevent you from surrendering to Allah: your worship of the cross, eating pork and your claim that Allah has a son’. They said: ‘Then who is the father of Jesus?’ The Prophet, Allah bless him and give him peace, was not in the habit of giving hasty answers but waited for Allah’s answer instead. Then Allah, exalted is He, revealed this verse (Lo! the likeness of Jesus with Allah is as the likeness of Adam…)”.


He chose both of them to be purified of the spirit (rūḥ) from passing from one body to another (tanāsukh) in the loins. He singled out Adam in creating him by His own hand, and Jesus (ʿa) in selecting the blowing of the spirit into him as a form of honor. Even though these two were weighty beings, the imperfection of events and creatureliness were nonetheless unavoidable for them:… then He said to him, ‘Be’, and he was [3:59].

Kashani (Shi`i)

Truly, the likeness of Jesus, in other words, his attribute in God’s sight, his being created by [divine] power without a father, is as Adam’s likeness, in having been created without parents. Know that the marvels of [divine] power are endless and there can be no analogy in this respect to the effect that there is an analogue from the world of wisdom for the creation of a human being without parents, since there are many deficient animal beings of unusual nature that are generated from the point of creation in a short period of time then reproduce and propagate [further]. Likewise, a human being can come into being by being generated in one of several cycles, then through propagation. Similarly is engenderment without a father, for the seminal fluid of a man is much hotter than that of a woman and contains a more powerful capacity for coagulation, just as in the case of rennets with regard to [the curdling of] cheese, whereas in the woman the more powerful capacity is that of being coagulated, as is the case with milk. When the two come together coagulation takes place, the fluids coagulate and the embryo is engendered. It is possible to have a strong female constitution that corresponds to a male constitution as can be seen in the case of many women, to the extent that what is generated in her right kidney [read: ovary?] is equivalent to male seminal fluid on account of its extreme heat sitting as it does next to the liver in the case of the woman the constitution of whose liver is sound and sufficiently hot, and that what is generated in her left kidney is equivalent to female seminal fluid. So when she experiences seminal emissions as a result of a male form overwhelming her imagination during sleep and consciousness because of her spirit’s being joined to the holy spirit and to another angel and [by] the imagination’s reproductive imitation (muḥākāt) of that [male form], as God, exalted be He says: and he became imaginalised to her as a man without fault [Q. 19:17], the two seminal fluids from both sides proceed to the womb. In the setting place on the right side is formed the stronger capacity for causing coagulation and in the setting place on the left side is formed the capacity for becoming coagulated whereupon the embryo is engendered and the spirit is attached to it. As for His saying: ‘Be’, and he was, this is an allusion to the infusion of the spirit, which derives from the world of the command and as such is not preceded by any substrata or [time] duration, as in the case of the creation of human bodies. Adam thus corresponds to Jesus as mentioned in that both share in the breaking of the [creational] habit and in that both of their bodies were created from the dust of the elements, both preceded by substrata and a duration, and that their spirit is originated [without precedent] from the world of the command which [spirit] is not preceded by substrata or duration.

6 Responses to “Otherworldly Origins: Adam and Jesus in the Quran”

  1. Hyde says : Reply

    Deaf, dumb and blind, they will not heed.

  2. ss hussain says : Reply

    allah creates adam without father and mother then allah con’t creates jesus for without mother?

  3. ss hussain says : Reply

    allah creates adam without father and mother then allah con’t creates jesus for without Father?

  4. Azmain says : Reply

    I think that it is unconvincing. From a study of the human creatures throughout history, it is clear that there has been a progression from the less human-like to the more human-like. It is so strange that Allah would create a creature (i.e. human) that fits so clearly into the progression and whose genetic and molecular biologies can entirely be explained through an evolutionary process.

    There are many beings who have lived, who if you saw them, you would think they were human, but the way they lived and acted, the way they genetically and structurally differed even if so slightly, cue us into knowing that they aren’t us.

    Could it be that Adam and Eve were humans of a type that came into contact with other types of humans and eventually overwhelmed these other types, thereby rendering them extinct? Could this be proven or not proven through genetic or molecular evidence? Is there the slightest possibility that the descendants of Adam may have had intercourse with other species of humans?

    Interesting questions, aren’t they?

  5. yes says : Reply

    adam was 60 cubits tall, and Allah said he changed the Jews who fished on the Sabbath into monkeys and pigs. What we see around us of the reality of things is contrary to what Darwin called the survival of the fittest. The earth, as it has gone through different stages in its long life, has been filled with the fittest and the unfit, of various kinds of animals. If Darwin’s theory was correct, then the simple, clear results of his law suggest that there should not still be living creatures that are still at the starting point, no matter how slow we may assume the progress of evolution to be. But we see that the starting point is still crowded with various weak creatures that are still living their lives, with their own characteristics, just as their ancestors also lived their lives in exactly the same manner. Conversely, we see that some highly evolved animals, such as the dinosaurs, have become extinct whilst insects such as flies and fleas still survive, as do others that are even weaker than them. The French professor Etienne Rebaud says in his book Will the Fit or the Unfit Survive? (p. 40): There is no such thing as natural selection in the course of fighting for survival, so that the strong survive and the weak diminish. For example, the garden lizard can run fast, because it has four long legs, but at the same type there are other types of lizards that have legs so short that they virtually crawl, dragging themselves along the ground with difficulty.… These types have the same physical makeup, even with regard to their legs; they eat the same food and live in the same environment. If these animals had adapted to their environment, there would not be such differences in their faculties and physical makeup.

    Contrary to the concept of natural selection, all these types of animals have survived and are still living and multiplying. For example, there are mountain rats that have short front legs and only move by jumping in a very awkward manner. Many insects cannot fly, even though they have big wings. So their physical makeup did not come about as a result of living beings trying to adapt to their circumstances. Rather, on the contrary, the way they live is shaped by their physical makeup and the way their different faculties function.
    my source is https://islamqa.info/en/answers/126913/does-refuting-the-darwinian-theory-of-evolution-imply-refuting-animal-and-plant-evolution

  6. Nice one Article Thanks for Sharing

Leave a Reply