The majority of us are progressivists. We view ourselves and the present age as the latest and greatest. Are we justified in believing this progressivism?

Are there scientific miracles in the Quran? Is the Quran 100% “scientifically accurate”? Here are the top 3 most common misconceptions about this subject.

Are there scientific miracles in the Quran? Is the Quran 100% “scientifically accurate”? Here are the top 3 most common misconceptions about this subject.

Are there scientific miracles in the Quran? Is the Quran 100% “scientifically accurate”? Here are the top 3 most common misconceptions about this subject.

What are some of these “a-scientific” realities? We discussed “time” here. Now let’s look at mind/consciousness.

A critical look at a common argument made by atheists, specifically regarding appeals to science. What does atheism and naturalism have to say about time?

Is “leap of faith” a good response to atheism? How can believers address the question, “How do you know God exists?” What is the proof of God’s existence?

desert2

In Part 3, we interrogated Genealogical Continuity (GC) in order to uncover its metaphysical underpinnings. We determined that GC is not falsifiable. Nothing in the fossil record or historical records more generally could be interpreted by scientists as evidence of a miraculous event such as the “creation of man.” This is because it is axiomatic

desert1

In Part 2, we discussed falsifiability as a primary characteristic distinguishing science from metaphysics. The question, now, is whether we should understand Genealogical Continuity (GC), i.e., common descent, as falsifiable and, hence, scientific. The best way to see how GC is not falsifiable and, hence, is metaphysical is to consider what empirical state of affairs

5157809799_08d31df86e_b

In Part 1, we discussed how the theory of common descent and Genealogical Continuity (GC) originated well before the advent of science as we know it. Admittedly, the fact that GC predates science does not by itself establish that GC is metaphysical and a-scientific. However, the following considerations prove just that. Popperian Falsifiability First of

TOP